SkyOwl is the analytics engine for aviation training — automated grading, root-cause analysis, and an intervention library, built around the non-technical skills that drive flight-deck performance: judgement, awareness, communication, decision-making.
Students brief tomorrow's flight with a study companion grounded in the org's manuals. Instructors review prior performance and lesson context.
During the flight or sim, instructors capture observations by voice or text. The engine maps them onto the org's competencies in real time.
The thinking-board surfaces root causes, contributing factors, and diagnostic paths. The student participates in the analysis — the conversation is the work.
Plans ship to the student's inbox — quizzes, NTS mini-games, research challenges, coaching arcs. Effectiveness flows back into the next debrief.
Voice notes, text observations, gradesheet entries — captured during the flight or sim. The engine maps notes onto the AOC's competencies, with a transparent trail back to the original observation.
The thinking-board surfaces root causes, contributing factors, and diagnostic paths. Failures trace from observable to indicator to root cause to intervention — across cognitive, physical, emotional, environmental, and interpersonal categories.
Live dashboards surface where the cohort is failing or doing well — by competency, aircraft, phase, instructor. Surface focus topics, draft simulator plans, and create quizzes or NTS mini-games — cross-referencing training data with your manuals and validated incident reports, then deployed to the right students with one click.
SkyOwl is powered by our sophisticated knowledge graph and reasoning layers, and augmented with your knowledge base. You choose what data feeds the reasoning layer, and we customize it for you — so you can focus on the insights, not the data work.
Support your trainees in between lessons — and deliver resources that different learners can interact with depending on their learning style.
Multiple-choice and short-answer drills, generated from manuals, SOPs, and the org's own training material. Every answer carries its citation.
Short interactive exercises targeting non-technical skills — situational awareness, decision-making, communication. Tuned to the student's weak competencies, and located in your specific operational challenges.
Scenario-based prompts that send students into the source documents — POH, MOM, ATC procedures — to extract the answer themselves.
Structured plans for students who've consistently failed a competency — a sequence of briefings, drills, and instructor checkpoints.
Diagnosed gaps become short, adaptive games a trainee actually plays — tuned to the competency they keep missing, and set in your own operation. Here's one running.